FORTUNEJACK.COM |10+ Years of Trust and Experience in Crypto Gambling

[Juggy777]

I don't think its bad that FortuneJack is charging a withdraw fee, I am actually surprised that they didn't introduce it in 2017-2018 when the fees were crazy high for transactions. I remember back then I think FJ paid like $50 per withdraw and I felt bad that they were losing so much money due to fees back then.

Now the fees are more fair, especially on the bitcoin network. Out of all the bitcoin services and exchanges that I use, they and Gemini are the only ones that DON'T charge for withdraw fees. Everything else out there has been charging for withdraw for years.

Even Poloniex back in the <$1000 days still charged a fixed fee of 0.00010000 Sats per withdraw even when the network was pretty much empty. They could of waived the fee but they charged it anyways.

@adaseb what were FJ thinking when they were paying $50 in fees and not collecting it back from the end user, and honestly this is a standard practise that many casinos do so I don’t think that people should get upset about paying a small fee as FJ also needs to take care of it’s expenses.

I think 2.5 bucks for a withdrawal is not really that bad neither, if that is the max cap I would totally agree that it should be around that level, anything substantial that should be sent very quickly will take a bit of time. Plus they probably do this with a lot of withdrawals as well at any time which makes their transactions bigger and bigger, which costs a lot more for the top heavy and a lot less for the smaller transactions.

However if this is not the max and it could be more than 2.5 dollars, that starts to go into levels of danger, I wouldn't suggest them to have like 10 bucks per withdrawal thing no matter how much someone withdraws, even if it is thousands of dollars it should be at max 3 bucks or so, bitcoin is not really that expensive to send or receive.

@TheGreatPython I totally agree with you that the fees should not be more than $2.5, unless the network is flooded and there’s no option but to charge high fees to make sure the transaction goes through.

[Lucky7btc]

You people are so darn stupid. Its clear FJ is struggling and yet you continue to defend them. No casino should be charging a fee to withdrawal via cryptocurrency. Only an idiot will think otherwise. FJ is heading downhill (Extreme delayed withdrawals, poorly trained staff, understaff, canceled sports betting, questionable dice games, blocking affiliates, etc.)  and yet you diehards will continue to sail on this sinking ship...

[Pmalek]

@Lucky7btc
You are free to use whatever alternative casino you want. Nobody is forcing you to use FortuneJack or follow their thread for that matter.
Why would you even follow what is being written about a "struggling" and "downhill moving" casino?  

[wwzsocki]

...FJ is heading downhill (Extreme delayed withdrawals, poorly trained staff, understaff, canceled sports betting, questionable dice games, blocking affiliates, etc.)  and yet you diehards will continue to sail on this sinking ship...

Let's break it into pieces:

1. Extreme delayed withdrawals - as for now all my withdrawals from FortuneJack were INSTANT.

2. Poorly trained staff, understaff - two days ago, I had to contact FJ support, I got help via chat and everything took max 10 minutes.

3. Canceled sports betting - I can understand that during the corona crisis many sports events are canceled, so bets have to be canceled also, not much they can do about in my opinion.

4. questionable dice games - never heard about, do you have any solid proofs?

5. blocking affiliates - indeed something changed in the ToS regarding players and affiliates, but nobody is blocking anybody, still one can be FJ affiliate if wish to, additionally, every company can choose                                   their affiliate politics and change or even stop it at any time.

You people are so darn stupid...Only an idiot will think otherwise...you diehards...

Welcome on my IGNORE list  .

[tbterryboy]

I don't think its bad that FortuneJack is charging a withdraw fee, I am actually surprised that they didn't introduce it in 2017-2018 when the fees were crazy high for transactions. I remember back then I think FJ paid like $50 per withdraw and I felt bad that they were losing so much money due to fees back then.

Now the fees are more fair, especially on the bitcoin network. Out of all the bitcoin services and exchanges that I use, they and Gemini are the only ones that DON'T charge for withdraw fees. Everything else out there has been charging for withdraw for years.

Even Poloniex back in the <$1000 days still charged a fixed fee of 0.00010000 Sats per withdraw even when the network was pretty much empty. They could of waived the fee but they charged it anyways.

When the price of bitcoin was lower I could understand the poloniex 0.0001 bitcoin, because it didn't worth anything at all. However that was back in the day, we need to scale, and what I mean is if bitcoin price reaches to 50k will we still have the same withdrawal fee? When price reaches 100k will the transaction fee be the same? A million dollars? There needs to be a scaling option in general. Hell the price seems to be high enough right now that we need to make it lower and lower.

Segwit helped a lot, LN will be amazing work, but in the end we need to adopt all of them very commonly so that we could make these transactions very cheap, if we do not start using segwit and lightning network very commonly, we are going to keep paying more for the fee.

[tokeweed]

With all the sudden interest in online poker lately, I was wondering if FJ would be interested in running a poker site and start of poker network for crypto.

Something like what WPN is doing.  Different poker skins but sharing the same player pool under one network.

[shield132]

With all the sudden interest in online poker lately, I was wondering if FJ would be interested in running a poker site and start of poker network for crypto.

Something like what WPN is doing.  Different poker skins but sharing the same player pool under one network.

That's my wish for years, they had an amazing poker game back in 2016 but suddenly they decided to stop it (maybe they had lack of users, I don't know exactly). I guess poker isn't in their to do list cause othetwise they would release their poker or at least join party poker network. So.. I guess there'll be no poker even right now when demand has grown so rapidly (not only on poker but on live blackjack too). Along this, demand on virtual sportsbook has grown too.

[davinchi]

@Lucky7btc
You are free to use whatever alternative casino you want. Nobody is forcing you to use FortuneJack or follow their thread for that matter.
Why would you even follow what is being written about a "struggling" and "downhill moving" casino?  

I have always believed that there could be two different type of experiences with same place, doesn't have to mean the place is awesome or bad, it just happens that sometimes it changes. For example, you could have withdrawn without a problem and that would be definitely what is expected, another person could withdraw and face a problem because of any reason at all, so it could take longer, or you could face with a support that is very well trained and doing his job awesome, another person could face with someone who is recently hired.

There are obvious stuff of course, like questionable dice games, dice is provably fair thing, it is never questionable, it is either provably fair or not, which is technologically checked if you want and not just make up a guess about it.

[FortuneJack]

BETA SITE IS LIVE NOW!



Hello dear players, time has come to announce this, FINALLY! After months of hard work,
we are ready to offer you a beta version of our new website. Bear in mind,
this is a beta version, which we wish to be actively tested,
so we keep working on improvements.

◾️ Every feedback will be appreciated, so here it is, consume, test and play, play, play! ◾️

[arallmuus]

Hello dear players,

Time has come to announce this, FINALLY! After months of hard work,
we are ready to offer you a beta version of our new website.
Bear in mind, this is a beta version, which we wish to be actively tested,
so we keep working on improvements.

◾️ Every feedback will be appreciated, so here it is, consume, test and play, play, play! ◾️

Havent really look much deeper yet at the beta site but, the old site look much more pleasing ( it could be just due to my eyes was much accustomed to the old site idk ) but the new beta site really shows professionalism for the site. It could be much better in the future though because this is just beta for now

[leea-1334]

This is 20 years old news for me 😜
I was offering from a guy who lived in Togo or somewhere in Africa. We even had telephone conversation several time back and forth before I left him alone LOL
Poor me or him, not sure 🤑

I cannot believe you actually kept in contact with the guy here!! What did you talk about,,, and who called who? International calls to that kind of place must have cost a lot of money in these days,,, so poor you if you spent a lot of money hehe 😜😜😜

[FortuneJack]

Hello dear players,

Time has come to announce this, FINALLY! After months of hard work,
we are ready to offer you a beta version of our new website.
Bear in mind, this is a beta version, which we wish to be actively tested,
so we keep working on improvements.

◾️ Every feedback will be appreciated, so here it is, consume, test and play, play, play! ◾️

Havent really look much deeper yet at the beta site but, the old site look much more pleasing ( it could be just due to my eyes was much accustomed to the old site idk ) but the new beta site really shows professionalism for the site. It could be much better in the future though because this is just beta for now

@arallmuus
It will for sure take some time to get your eyes adapted to the new layout.


Thanks for the feedback!

[Bajank]

can not be denied until now FORTUNEJACK.COM is one of the interesting gambling places and play fair I am very happy to play gambling at FORTUNEJACK.COM even though I am an unlucky person

[amiraja2]

BETA SITE IS LIVE NOW!



Hello dear players, time has come to announce this, FINALLY! After months of hard work,
we are ready to offer you a beta version of our new website. Bear in mind,
this is a beta version, which we wish to be actively tested,
so we keep working on improvements.

◾️ Every feedback will be appreciated, so here it is, consume, test and play, play, play! ◾️

I think the look of the beta is very interesting, it might make all the players better and more fun and, most importantly, the beta will be easier to win.

[Bitinity]

I think the look of the beta is very interesting, it might make all the players better and more fun and, most importantly, the beta will be easier to win.

I cant fully understand the last part of your post, what do you mean by beta will be easier to win? Does it mean that players will get bigger chance to win during the beta? If so, how this beta affect your winning chance? Sorry but I dont understand at all, would you mind to explain it a little bit more?

[BitSat19]

can not be denied until now FORTUNEJACK.COM is one of the interesting gambling places and play fair I am very happy to play gambling at FORTUNEJACK.COM even though I am an unlucky person

You are not alone in unlucky persons list because its very long fortunejack.com is really doing great work for attracting new and interest of exciting members beta version is good even need some more time because its very usual for all we never accept changes very quickly.

[Pmalek]

I cant fully understand the last part of your post, what do you mean by beta will be easier to win?

The new layout has now affect on the outcome of games. Maybe he was trying to say that the new layout will make gambling more pleasant and it will be easier because of that.
I like the new design. My favorite part are the pictures of the Live Casino dealers. 
I think more info about the welcome bonuses should be visible on top.

[notocactus]

Dice Blue

At the Dice blue, would you mind adjust the font size smaller, please. Or at least give gamblers options to set up fontsize for their interests. The default fontsize is too large on the beta version.

[tomahawk9]

First thing that caught my eye in the beta site was the huge amount of empty spaces on each category (main page, casino, provably fair, live casino, all except Sports).
For instance, the 'signup' and 'login' buttons on the navigation bar look kinda big to me which make the whole navbar look much bigger than it should and some empty spaces appear:

-Beta site (main page):
https://i.imgur.com/Bhsc7hf.png
big empty black space between the text on the top and the main image. Too much black may look a bit overwhelming.

-Regular site (main page):
https://i.imgur.com/g0yrVpc.png
No big spaces, efficient use of space, no overwhelming use of black color and everything looks pleasing to the eye.

It could be the 'navbar text' on the beta site is using a small font size? or perhaps that the images on the slideshow are a bit small?
Another case of empty spaces:

-Beta site (casino)
https://i.imgur.com/R5xBXlk.png
Big empty space on the left. Massive empty space between the 'search games' bar and the icons (below) and the slideshow (above). Those different shades of black look like an attempt (?) to hide the empty spaces.

-Regular site(casino)
https://i.imgur.com/KebFHJs.png
Not as clean as the beta, although the flashy images don't help, but still, no big empty spaces, and no need to add different colors or bars. The use of an animated search bar + transparent bar is great.

Some empty spaces here and there might give a website a cleaner and more minimalistic look, but sometimes it could also make it look a bit plain and weird 

[FortuneJack]

@tomahawk9, @tranthidung, @Pmalek, @BitSat19, @Bitinity, @amiraja2, @Bajank, @arallmuus


-
would love to thank everyone who's getting involved, all of your suggestions are noted.

Bring them on, more to go