FORTUNEJACK.COM |10+ Years of Trust and Experience in Crypto Gambling

[ryzaadit]

A bit late about review the news site, here my review about the new beta site.

Dice Tabs :
 
Comparing the design of the oldest dice with the news dice from the beta site, I feel personally the oldest design better than new dice. The design of the oldest dice more precise, neat, and pleasing to the eye just makes the dice-box more bigger since it still has some space beside on the chatbox. For the new dice, it's a bit messy from the design and the font size to bigger for my opinion.

All information about the betting activity on the oldest dice seen in a single screen, went the new dice we need scroll down a little bit to see about ur profit, lose, and jackpot.

The button feature a bit makes me confused at the first time i used it, i think the purpose of this button from my perspective should be like this:
[1] (...) Should be a more information button about the dice.
[2] (+) Should add more balance and could be a deposit button for the player so the player who losing on the dice and they want to deposit more no need to go on wallet tabs.
But went u tried the button (+) give me more information about the dice and (...) nothing happened to the button.

Scroll it down a little bit, balance information and roll button a bit cover up the information of winning, game and betting history makes me disturb and since the roll button also on there some player could be making a mistake to hit that button went see that information



A good thing about the new dice, we have some Dice X & Y. Thats could be used for 2 type of game went the Dice X can be auto betting and Dice Y manual betting.

Wallets Management:
On the wallets management, there a bit error went we set up the address also went the error already gone after the save changes were clicked nothing happened and i cannot save the address already tried a few times cant saved the address. IDK did i need to have a balance on that coins first before can add the news address of some coins?

[tokeweed]

they did not pay me

They did not pay you for what? Did you win big here and you did not get your withdrawal? Kindly explain your problem if it does truely exist, otherwise you are just spreading FUD. Oh wait, you have just came to this forum and you have accused 3 different casinos as scam already and you give a good feedback for one casino. Not to mention that you are shilling that site but it sounds fishy for me.
Anyway, no one would care any baseless accusations.

Check his post history.  Lolol.  He's calling out a couple other sites of 'scamming' him.  And here's the thing...  Wait for other noob accounts come in here and post the same thing.

It's prolly just one guy.  Lawl.

[arallmuus]

You forget something, people dont literally choose esports when they have no soccer games to bet. Someone cant suddenly love esports unless you really play that game as well. There are tons of virtual sports in most sportsbetting site right now and alof of people will choose that over esports. Also things could be going much better in the near future as some team in premier league has called their players back

Which could really means alot of things but it could be because they are going to resume to league soon  

You do not really see the difference that adding couldn't really hurt anything at all. The worst case scenario not many people will play and you will probably just see it continue without getting too much attention from the people and that's about it. However if you really have something special and many people start to flock to it, you will see it get lively and bunch of wagers and all that.

So, what is the downside to adding this? How could it hurt to add it? I do not see any changes at all and there is only positives to it. If you do marketing to promote the esports part more, that could cost you some money and if you do not get anything in return that could be the downside, but as long as you do not really spend any money on it, there is nothing bad neither.

You should really learn to read everything before you quote my post and write nonsense against it.  

perhaps you should read everything here https://asktom.cf/index.php?topic=774929.msg54382275#msg54382275

My post is a response to a post that I quoted, if you only quote a portion of it and post nonsense about it then you should probably find some other nonsense post to do that. I wrote a legit responses to the post that I was quoted before, feel free to check the link and READ EVERYTHING

[wwzsocki]

If you already set the BTC address on the main website, it should be already back up on the new beta site for the address...

No, I haven't and I really hope that this will be not necessary to use the slow feature on new website because I use almost always new addresses when withdrawing funds.

It will be great if I can just fill the address and proceed with the withdrawal, as it is on the old website.

I know that addresses whitelisting is for security reasons, but I would like to be able to choose if I want to use it, because it is obvious that it doesn't work if somebody uses new addresses, just like me.

...It is truly another crazy period with transaction fees...

I thought that Lightning Network will resolve these problems and times with high fees are long gone. Again, it makes BTC unusable and it is only 10K, at 20K nobody can afford such fees.

[FanEagle]

I didn't mean like esports was something very small that suddenly became bigger. I know that esports was big but at the same time the only reason why it was big was the viewers not the gamblers. Definitely esports had some gambling as well but comparing it to big guns like basketball, football, american football and even some other stuff would be naive, esports was nowhere near that level at all.

Obviously right now they are the biggest because the other ones are cancelled or postponed, which means there is no basketball, there is no football, there is no nfl and the only thing left is esports which makes it evidently bigger than everything and biggest of right now. This doesn't mean esports was nothing and now something, it just means that it was probably in top 10 but became the top one after all of this.

They have both got huge bettor/fan base just try to look up the statistics https://www.statista.com/statistics/618967/espots-betting-market-wagers-worldwide/ and see how big the market of Esports have, But i agree with you for comparing it on some games since those what mentioned sports by you is the old one and try to see the statistic the Esport is talking a good step and became a billion $ industry.

I understand that esports was always big, and I understand that there is thousands if not millions of people watch the big games combined, sure maybe one game doesn't get millions, but in football world which is probably the biggest sport in the world not really all games get millions of viewers neither, only the good teams get it, or important matches.

So, I understand that esports have overcame a lot of sports, its probably getting a lot more views compared to stuff like tennis or golf but for some reason cs:go stars do not get the treatment Nadal gets, even though they might be making more money and gets more views. Hence what I meant was, they must be starting to get that NOW because of pandemic, you can think people were watching or betting on esports a lot before but you can't deny that it must have increased during this period.

[AakZaki]

~snip~
PS
It would be great to know the fees before withdraw because they are pretty high. I just paid 0.00115662 BTC, which is almost 10% of the withdrawn amount.

If I knew they are so high, I would accumulate more and withdraw at once.

https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/tx/4a11ee06a5703c1b1472db2ee07a264eefdd7515ad80337dcbb0dfe160a8c07d/

If you don't make a deposit from your personal wallet and only get paid for the Fortune Jack Campaign I think it won't be a problem.

Maybe you better enjoy the rest than what you get.  If only I were in your position I would not have disputed that and would enjoy the rest of the payment.

[ryzaadit]

I thought that Lightning Network will resolve these problems and times with high fees are long gone. Again, it makes BTC unusable and it is only 10K, at 20K nobody can afford such fees.

Lightning Network has a maximum amount of transactions they can handle, so basically it's not really suitable for the transaction.

Also most of the users not really aware of "Lightning Network" and cannot set up the node. Probably a few users using a cryptocurrency just for their optional transaction since gambling using a "BANK" and "FIAT" need time to process the transaction. Because of that, they not really learn more about bitcoin and cryptocurrency what they know only "how to make a transaction on cryptocurrency".

[Lauda]

...It is truly another crazy period with transaction fees...

I thought that Lightning Network will resolve these problems and times with high fees are long gone. Again, it makes BTC unusable and it is only 10K, at 20K nobody can afford such fees.

It is not a crazy period and the fees were temporarily higher, but far from crazy. You need to expand knowledge on the use of Bitcoin, surpassing 'pressing the send' button. It would definitely be beneficial for FJ to show the fee in advance or even better to pay the fees themselves from the profits (they have many options in terms of reducing the paid fees, far more than the number of possibilities that a user of said platform has).

[joksim299]

...It is truly another crazy period with transaction fees...

I thought that Lightning Network will resolve these problems and times with high fees are long gone. Again, it makes BTC unusable and it is only 10K, at 20K nobody can afford such fees.

It is not a crazy period and the fees were temporarily higher, but far from crazy. You need to expand knowledge on the use of Bitcoin, surpassing 'pressing the send' button. It would definitely be beneficial for FJ to show the fee in advance or even better to pay the fees themselves from the profits (they have many options in terms of reducing the paid fees, far more than the number of possibilities that a user of said platform has).

They should allow custom fee and display satoshi per byte in advance.

[logfiles]

They should allow custom fee and display satoshi per byte in advance.

This is why i like Bustadice, the fee is displayed in advance both for instant and other withdrawals.  I don't know how they do it but Fortune jack should probably pick a leaf from them via low withdraw fees because the transactions still get quick confirmations.

For example right now the fee for instant withdrawal is just 154 bits (0.000154 BTC) which is around 10 times lower than the fee wwzsocki  used recently... And that is the highest fee i have seen on bustadice since i started using it.



Under normal circumstance it's usually around 30bits (0.00003BTC) for instant withdrawals

[Lucky7btc]

...It is truly another crazy period with transaction fees...

I thought that Lightning Network will resolve these problems and times with high fees are long gone. Again, it makes BTC unusable and it is only 10K, at 20K nobody can afford such fees.

It is not a crazy period and the fees were temporarily higher, but far from crazy. You need to expand knowledge on the use of Bitcoin, surpassing 'pressing the send' button. It would definitely be beneficial for FJ to show the fee in advance or even better to pay the fees themselves from the profits (they have many options in terms of reducing the paid fees, far more than the number of possibilities that a user of said platform has).

They should allow custom fee and display satoshi per byte in advance.

They shouldn't be charging you a fee for crypto cashout in the first place. I can understand 1 free a week and then maybe charging for additional withdrawals within a 7 days period. But to outright charge you is not right.

[ploop1212]

Does anyone know if the first withdrawal normally has a delay? Got an email saying because it is my first withdraw they have to go through security checks.

[TheUltraElite]

Does anyone know if the first withdrawal normally has a delay? Got an email saying because it is my first withdraw they have to go through security checks.

You can contact their live support system by the small bubble in the lower right corner of the webpage. It may have been triggered by some security protocol. For the ease of mind talking their support team might give you some ease. However you might have to wait for sometime because they are understaffed in this situation and you might need to provide some information regarding the source of the money if they find it to be suspicious.

I hope you get your money soon though. Nobody likes it when it happens to them.

[Lauda]

...It is truly another crazy period with transaction fees...

I thought that Lightning Network will resolve these problems and times with high fees are long gone. Again, it makes BTC unusable and it is only 10K, at 20K nobody can afford such fees.

It is not a crazy period and the fees were temporarily higher, but far from crazy. You need to expand knowledge on the use of Bitcoin, surpassing 'pressing the send' button. It would definitely be beneficial for FJ to show the fee in advance or even better to pay the fees themselves from the profits (they have many options in terms of reducing the paid fees, far more than the number of possibilities that a user of said platform has).

They should allow custom fee and display satoshi per byte in advance.

FortuneJack is not a wallet, therefore it should not allow a custom fee. They should however display the fee in advance. It would be better to change the system to a fixed fee-system, and to do UTXO consolidation in the background.

[notocactus]

Does Fortunejack have more users than STake.com?

I don't know but it i to easy to check it by yourself. If you have not yet had accounts on two platforms, please create yours now and you will get your userid. From user ids on two platforms, you will know which ones have more registered users so clear. But such figures include both multi accounts as well as banned ones, and you won't get figures for legit and active users.

Two platforms have nearly the same registered users does not mean their quality or attraction on gamblers are at same level.

[Lauda]

Does Fortunejack have more users than STake.com?

I don't know but it i to easy to check it by yourself. If you have not yet had accounts on two platforms, please create yours now and you will get your userid. From user ids on two platforms, you will know which ones have more registered users so clear. But such figures include both multi accounts as well as banned ones, and you won't get figures for legit and active users.

Two platforms have nearly the same registered users does not mean their quality or attraction on gamblers are at same level.

Correct. At this level this information is not really important unless somebody is looking to acquire one of these.

[Juggy777]

Does Fortunejack have more users than STake.com?

I don't know but it i to easy to check it by yourself. If you have not yet had accounts on two platforms, please create yours now and you will get your userid. From user ids on two platforms, you will know which ones have more registered users so clear. But such figures include both multi accounts as well as banned ones, and you won't get figures for legit and active users.

Two platforms have nearly the same registered users does not mean their quality or attraction on gamblers are at same level.

Correct. At this level this information is not really important unless somebody is looking to acquire one of these.

@moriagare I’m not sure why you needed that information, but in my personal opinion talking about a competitor casino in this Ann doesn’t feel right, as this Ann should only be discussing about FJ and not about it’s competitors. Furthermore as @Lauda has correctly said that if you’re keen to buy FJ or invest in it then you should contact them directly with your proposal, because I don’t think that they’ll respond to a public proposal in case you decide to make one.

[Bitinity]

Does anyone know if the first withdrawal normally has a delay? Got an email saying because it is my first withdraw they have to go through security checks.

Standard security check is a common thing here especially if it is your first withdrawal or you use different withdrawal address (if it is not your first withdrawal). Active players can get the same delay as well, it can be related to the game providers (if you play 3rd party games).  No need to worry, you'll get your money eventually if there is nothing wrong with your account.

[RealMalatesta]

Does Fortunejack have more users than STake.com?

I don't know but it i to easy to check it by yourself. If you have not yet had accounts on two platforms, please create yours now and you will get your userid. From user ids on two platforms, you will know which ones have more registered users so clear. But such figures include both multi accounts as well as banned ones, and you won't get figures for legit and active users.

Two platforms have nearly the same registered users does not mean their quality or attraction on gamblers are at same level.

Correct. At this level this information is not really important unless somebody is looking to acquire one of these.

@moriagare I’m not sure why you needed that information, but in my personal opinion talking about a competitor casino in this Ann doesn’t feel right, as this Ann should only be discussing about FJ and not about it’s competitors. Furthermore as @Lauda has correctly said that if you’re keen to buy FJ or invest in it then you should contact them directly with your proposal, because I don’t think that they’ll respond to a public proposal in case you decide to make one.

Having the user id would mean nothing if there are a billion registered people but there aren't many active. Right now I could actually check it. There is about 1.8k people live on stake, which is actually quite a lot, many websites go to profitable side after reaching 100, of course stake has a shit ton more costs than almost everyone, which means even with 1.8k being active on the website may not be profitable unless they play proper gambling with decent amount.

I can't open fortunejack right now because I am not on my own PC and do not have VPN here on work computer, and I can't open fortunejack without VPN from my country. But if there is a number there as well, if you see fortunejack live accounts you can see if it is under 1.8k or over it.

[ralle14]

Having the user id would mean nothing if there are a billion registered people but there aren't many active. Right now I could actually check it. There is about 1.8k people live on stake, which is actually quite a lot, many websites go to profitable side after reaching 100, of course stake has a shit ton more costs than almost everyone, which means even with 1.8k being active on the website may not be profitable unless they play proper gambling with decent amount.

I can't open fortunejack right now because I am not on my own PC and do not have VPN here on work computer, and I can't open fortunejack without VPN from my country. But if there is a number there as well, if you see fortunejack live accounts you can see if it is under 1.8k or over it.

The current number of online users in fortunejack's dice is only 20 but I wouldn't say stake is better just because they have a lot of users there's too many things to mention(games, promotions, etc) it'll depend on the preference of each gambler. Anyway like they've mentioned above this isn't really a big deal for us gamblers unless you're a type of gambler who likes to interact with the chat and the actual users in stake could be less than 1.8k since they're not that strict with having alt accounts.