Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[CryptSafe]

…

I think it's not the casino itself, but most likely the gaming providers that they have in their casinos that might restrict you and the rest of the countries that they have listed. But obviously there are countries that are really rouge like North Korea or Syria.

And there are cases that casinos lifted some of the restrictions so, we can hope that your country might be allowed in the future.

Also, there could be countries that is ban online, but they are allowed to play in land based casinos, so there are a lot of inconsistencies.

I think he quoted the casino general ToS which means it’s not a game provider restrictions rather the casino itself. Some casino doesn’t have an IP ban to the country that they are restricted. You will only realized that your country is restricted if you read the ToS or the support freeze your account.

I forgot some casino that do this but mostly new casino and few old casino that recently updated their restrictions on some country.

However, there’s a separate restricted country of each game provider and payment processor listed on the casino ToS which can be overlooked.

Most casinos that do not restrict IPs do update their ToS and it could only be seen when there is an account freeze maybe upon withdrawal or so but it is not ideal to allow IPs of banned or restricted nations to play on casinos that restricted them as it is not making any sense. When the players deposit, and they allow but upon withdrawal, they get their funds frozen. On the other hand, I would blame players for not taking their time to read ToS before getting engaged with the casinos because that would have saved them a lot of energy from the stress associated with frozen accounts on counts of restricted nations. These are the things I check for before I register with the casino so I do not get stucked up with restriction issues while trying to make a withdrawal as most casinos act very funny though.

[Shishir99]

Actually, it depends on their marketing whether there is a need for a review campaign? Or is an away campaign enough for wider exposure? The manager must have a good understanding of this because they are experienced.

There are many casinos that don't have review campaigns but the casino has become bigger and more recognized because of the wide promotion.

Sometimes the managers try to convince the casinos for several types of campaigns, but if casino owners or the marketing manager do not want to run different campaigns, then the manager can't do much about it. Older casinos do not need to run review campaigns. New casinos should try to review campaigns so they can understand what they should improve. But as I said, if they do not have enough marketing budget and resource, they may do not want to run additional campaigns.

[avp2306]

Actually, it depends on their marketing whether there is a need for a review campaign? Or is an away campaign enough for wider exposure? The manager must have a good understanding of this because they are experienced.

There are many casinos that don't have review campaigns but the casino has become bigger and more recognized because of the wide promotion.

Sometimes the managers try to convince the casinos for several types of campaigns, but if casino owners or the marketing manager do not want to run different campaigns, then the manager can't do much about it. Older casinos do not need to run review campaigns. New casinos should try to review campaigns so they can understand what they should improve. But as I said, if they do not have enough marketing budget and resource, they may do not want to run additional campaigns.

Everything would really depends on what is the decision of the owners since somehow they are the one who will ask the managers to launch a review campaigns. But since there's no answer with this suggestion so maybe we can assume that they don't need to have this campaign since the owner is confident that their casino is fine.

We also see how professional the manager handling their campaign and if the casino owners would ask him to launch this one for sure that review campaign which people talk about here might provably happen. I guess this is minimal activities and for sure they would look after on those suggestion in this thread. For now its better for them to enjoy what Betpanda could offer.

[SamReomo]

By his management in signature campaigns and his replies in many threads, I think with his knowledge and experience in gambling, it's not too hard for him to manage a Review Campaign.

It's up to Bepanda team as one company can hire different outsources for different tasks like signature campaign and review campaign.

I fully agree with you he's a reputed campaign manager of the forum and I believe it won't be hard to manage a review campaign either. We all know that he's someone managing multiple signature campaigns and someone like him can also manage review campaign without any trouble. I also agree that Betpanda team can hire more than one person for different tasks. Like Little Mouse for the signature campaign and someone else to manage the review campaign.

[BABY SHOES]

Actually, it depends on their marketing whether there is a need for a review campaign? Or is an away campaign enough for wider exposure? The manager must have a good understanding of this because they are experienced.

There are many casinos that don't have review campaigns but the casino has become bigger and more recognized because of the wide promotion.

Sometimes the managers try to convince the casinos for several types of campaigns, but if casino owners or the marketing manager do not want to run different campaigns, then the manager can't do much about it. Older casinos do not need to run review campaigns. New casinos should try to review campaigns so they can understand what they should improve. But as I said, if they do not have enough marketing budget and resource, they may do not want to run additional campaigns.

Everything would really depends on what is the decision of the owners since somehow they are the one who will ask the managers to launch a review campaigns. But since there's no answer with this suggestion so maybe we can assume that they don't need to have this campaign since the owner is confident that their casino is fine.

Yeah as long as the casino doesn't suffer a lot of accusations then it's fine... but I think the casino owners will first evaluate the results of the signature campaign then after that they will think of another campaign.

For Betpanda wouldn't you make it more interesting on social Twitter/X where if there's a contest guess the blurred image of a slot or guess some game? Usually this will attract the attention of many people outside the forum.

[Wiwo]

Most casinos that do not restrict IPs do update their ToS and it could only be seen when there is an account freeze maybe upon withdrawal or so but it is not ideal to allow IPs of banned or restricted nations to play on casinos that restricted them as it is not making any sense. When the players deposit, and they allow but upon withdrawal, they get their funds frozen. On the other hand, I would blame players for not taking their time to read ToS before getting engaged with the casinos because that would have saved them a lot of energy from the stress associated with frozen accounts on counts of restricted nations. These are the things I check for before I register with the casino so I do not get stucked up with restriction issues while trying to make a withdrawal as most casinos act very funny though.

We'll not blame the players entirely for this, Because what I noticed with casinos that have regional restrictions is that, they always deny players from such regions access to the site with error messages telling you that their IP is not allowed, so players both newbies from such a region will have no access at all and if they sort for other alternatives like using VPN, they will be doing that having it in mind the risk of losing their account and whatever balance that is in them so avoid VPN.

But If a casino did not deny players access or ban their IP, whatever comes out along the way will be a shared fault and no one can blame the players for not reading the TOS carefully to note the clues that mention restrictions and access, so you see why we can not blame those newbies for making such mistakes.

[Jaycoinz]

Actually, it depends on their marketing whether there is a need for a review campaign? Or is an away campaign enough for wider exposure? The manager must have a good understanding of this because they are experienced.

There are many casinos that don't have review campaigns but the casino has become bigger and more recognized because of the wide promotion.

Sometimes the managers try to convince the casinos for several types of campaigns, but if casino owners or the marketing manager do not want to run different campaigns, then the manager can't do much about it. Older casinos do not need to run review campaigns. New casinos should try to review campaigns so they can understand what they should improve. But as I said, if they do not have enough marketing budget and resource, they may do not want to run additional campaigns.

That's why the manager should enlightened of how important it is on running a steady long lasting campaign which ofcourse the issue of big budget will still come to play as for the review campaign, I think it depends on the particular audience there are trying to target because most times that's also some of the reason for the maybe the advertising manager would want to refuse to actually set up a review or even maybe the casino have outgrown such phase because most times review campaign is done by the new casino.

[Ojima-ojo]

Actually, it depends on their marketing whether there is a need for a review campaign? Or is an away campaign enough for wider exposure? The manager must have a good understanding of this because they are experienced.

There are many casinos that don't have review campaigns but the casino has become bigger and more recognized because of the wide promotion.

Sometimes the managers try to convince the casinos for several types of campaigns, but if casino owners or the marketing manager do not want to run different campaigns, then the manager can't do much about it. Older casinos do not need to run review campaigns. New casinos should try to review campaigns so they can understand what they should improve. But as I said, if they do not have enough marketing budget and resource, they may do not want to run additional campaigns.

That's why the manager should enlightened of how important it is on running a steady long lasting campaign which ofcourse the issue of big budget will still come to play as for the review campaign, I think it depends on the particular audience there are trying to target because most times that's also some of the reason for the maybe the advertising manager would want to refuse to actually set up a review or even maybe the casino have outgrown such phase because most times review campaign is done by the new casino.

Manager team relationship and communications grows over time and we need to take things one step at a time, I am very sure that Little mouse knows exactly what best for the project and how to go about it, so for that let give them sometimes to become by at least the signature campaign is live now and in no time the reflection of that on the project will be noticed and there be need for other types of promotion then they can have a talk with the manager just like every other projects does it.

[Jating]

Actually, it depends on their marketing whether there is a need for a review campaign? Or is an away campaign enough for wider exposure? The manager must have a good understanding of this because they are experienced.

There are many casinos that don't have review campaigns but the casino has become bigger and more recognized because of the wide promotion.

Sometimes the managers try to convince the casinos for several types of campaigns, but if casino owners or the marketing manager do not want to run different campaigns, then the manager can't do much about it. Older casinos do not need to run review campaigns. New casinos should try to review campaigns so they can understand what they should improve. But as I said, if they do not have enough marketing budget and resource, they may do not want to run additional campaigns.

That's why the manager should enlightened of how important it is on running a steady long lasting campaign which ofcourse the issue of big budget will still come to play as for the review campaign, I think it depends on the particular audience there are trying to target because most times that's also some of the reason for the maybe the advertising manager would want to refuse to actually set up a review or even maybe the casino have outgrown such phase because most times review campaign is done by the new casino.

The audience will remain the same it will still be the gamblers, how can someone make a review if he doesn't know to play or gamble in a particular platform? And there are a lot of casino review website already. So if you have a signature campaign, doesn't make sense to run it concurrently with a review campaign. And again, we are in the biggest crypto community and there are a lot of gamblers here and they are giving feedback in the ANN thread and there has been a lot of discussions already.

So it will be enough to just have a signature campaign if we talk about marketing and promotion here in the community. So the best order will be run a signature campaign first and maybe think of other promotions like in the Games and rounds board.

[Perfectbaby]

-snip-

Making a micro transaction campaign for games and round, and the team can start reminder the campaign on the thread almost everyday. Neither everyone are gonna to see "Service" board cause most of the review campaign are being posted on there and having more less chance bring user comparing to games & round.

If they decides to run a review campaign on the game & round section it would fine, and just as you said it would be more better for them to linked it with this place so that more people can visit on a regular basis. But on the other hands, signature campaign will also help in gaining the attention and exposure required if they run for long term.
Like i said earlier most of the casinos over here that has gain reputation was a results of long term running, and most of them has spent 2 years and some of them has also spent about 3-4 years with consistencies running all time, this makes people to put more trust in them and they also responds to issues with this people can start prioritizing them over those that doesn't last or that just run for few weeks.

[Shishir99]

That's why the manager should enlightened of how important it is on running a steady long lasting campaign which ofcourse the issue of big budget will still come to play as for the review campaign, I think it depends on the particular audience there are trying to target because most times that's also some of the reason for the maybe the advertising manager would want to refuse to actually set up a review or even maybe the casino have outgrown such phase because most times review campaign is done by the new casino.

If a casino does not have enough budget for marketing, no matter how the managers try to convince them, they won't understand the point. Even if they understand, they cannot run a campaign for a long time due to resources. Rollbit, duelbits, stakes, and some other casinos running signature campaigns for a long time. They have a hefty marketing budget, so they don't care how much it costs. They know the outcome they are going to get from this forum.

Sometimes new casinos want to try a campaign for a few weeks only to check how it works. Unfortunately, the expectation is too much. That is why we often see casinos stop their campaign after a few weeks.

[Betpanda]

Happy new year everybody!

Thank you all very much for your welcome responses and our apologies for going dark immediately after posting the initial message (damn holidays), it was certainly not our intention to Post & Ghost.

We are of course glad to see that our initial post created such a buzz, and we are here to answer any questions you may have, so let's get to it.

Regional sponsor of Argentina is a pretty big deal. Are you the official representative of this site? If so, why didn't you write some important details regarding this site?

Coming to the site itself, I loved the UI and observed that y'all are advertising zero KYC, but that's tough to believe these days. Can you provide more clarity related to this topic?

We are indeed! As @text already pointed out, you can find this from the AFA’s website where we are listed as an official regional partner.

Also, what important details would you like to know, we will gladly answer any questions. On the KYC front, we will elaborate on this just below.

Do you have any planned welcome bonus specifically for bitcointalk users?

We have a special multiplier contest coming your way very soon where all the prizes are straight cash! We will keep you updated on when this goes live.

But it will be same as most other casinos (E.g. we will only apply it for suspicious activity). I just checked the review and complaints of Betpanda on some platform. KYC verification requirement is also mentioned in your terms. And here is the proof that your casino isn't anonymous:

We are indeed KYC free…as long as you adhere to the rules of our services. All the players who use our services as intended, simply to enjoy our offerings and do not engage in activity that could be considered suspicious, you will enjoy full anonymity for as long as you continue to do so.

this shows you are ready in this presentation but after posting you did not pay attention in the welcoming and inquiries here .

This is true. I noticed this myself since op created this particular thread. I am starting to wonder whether he is the official representative of Betpanda or not now thanks to his inactiveness in this forum.

We do apologise for this, we will be much more active in the new year!

Is there any error in your site? But I hope that is just for temporary as you may already see this and fix immediately. Anybody have the same as me?

We do not have a wider error with deposits, does the problem still persist?

And someone mentioned earlier, Messi fans will like it. Yes Messi fans will surely be happy. I wish you all the best.

Fans of Messi, CR7 and everyone else are all welcome at Betpanda!

How does the welcome bonus work? Do we need to wager the deposited amount with rounds of about 40 times for the bonus to be released? Are there any other requirements?

Is there any promotion for those who place sports bets?

Yes, the wagering is 40x for the deposit+bonus. At the moment we don’t have a sports specific bonus, but we will certainly relay the message forward that this has been requested.

So let us hope that in this new year, the team is going to consider a lot of suggestions that have been provided here on this thread and also improve a lot more in the market as time goes on.

All your suggestions are and will be read, so please keep them coming, they are going straight up the chain to the individuals who decide on these matters.

If we have missed any questions or didn’t answer them to the degree you were hoping, please let us know. 

[freedomgo]

I was exploring some NBA markets today, and I’m pretty impressed with the competitive odds available. Honestly, that’s one of the main things I look for in a sportsbook, and BetPanda has really nailed it. On top of that, their cool UI makes it such a smooth experience, and with these competitive odds, I’m seriously considering transferring over.

[yedmon]

Scam casino, avoid this scammers

[Kemarit]

I received my free spins and played Nolimit City's Beheaded  

Win some money as well, not sure though if others have tried and received their free spins as well. Who knows, it might be your lucky day!!

@freedomgo - just to let you know, minimum bet is $1.00 for sports, or at least in the NBA games.

[Ojima-ojo]

Scam casino, avoid this scammers

What makes them scam why coming up with a statement like this without any evidence, this is an online forum and we don't entertain fuds and unfunded statements that can damage the image of a brand, you need to be careful next time and if you have any case why not open and accusations thread with all the evidence.


Next time take note, because this is a new casino that is trying to build an image here in this forum and any negative feedback should be avoided unless there is any tangible case.

[Mahdirakib]

We are indeed KYC free…as long as you adhere to the rules of our services. All the players who use our services as intended, simply to enjoy our offerings and do not engage in activity that could be considered suspicious, you will enjoy full anonymity for as long as you continue to do so.

'Suspicious activity', I was expecting that in your response. Don't you know that most other crypto casino applies the KYC verification rules in case of suspicious activity only? None of them are promoting themselves as anonymous casino except Betpanda and other casinos under "SBM S.R.L". Does Cryptorino and Casinopunkz also owned and operated by the same team?

[Baofeng]

I was exploring some NBA markets today, and I’m pretty impressed with the competitive odds available. Honestly, that’s one of the main things I look for in a sportsbook, and BetPanda has really nailed it. On top of that, their cool UI makes it such a smooth experience, and with these competitive odds, I’m seriously considering transferring over.

Not just competitive, but they offer more flexible odds as well, just like in one game in the NBA, when some of the well known casinos starts with a -4.5 lets says, Betpanda has lower it more to -2.5. Of course the pay is also lower, but if you are a bettor like me who loves to parlay bets, this is going to be a good advantage as most of the time just one game and everything will destroy your bets.

At least if you start with a lower odds, there could be a great chance that teams can cover it for you, just saying.  . Same with player props, it's a wide selection as well so I must say that gamblers should take advantage of their sport bookies.

[yedmon]

Scam casino, avoid this scammers

What makes them scam why coming up with a statement like this without any evidence, this is an online forum and we don't entertain fuds and unfunded statements that can damage the image of a brand, you need to be careful next time and if you have any case why not open and accusations thread with all the evidence.


Next time take note, because this is a new casino that is trying to build an image here in this forum and any negative feedback should be avoided unless there is any tangible case.

I have provided evidence earlier in this thread, browse more carefully.
I decided to duplicate the information so that other participants would not suffer as I did.

[BitMaxz]

I have provided evidence earlier in this thread, browse more carefully.
I decided to duplicate the information so that other participants would not suffer as I did.

I can't seem to find any evidence that you provided from the previous post. What I see is a post like in 1Win accusing the platform as a scammer. It appears that you are accusing casinos such as 1Win of being scams, but you have yet to provide any evidence. And now you are accusing Betpanda of being another scammer without any solid proof. Please review your previous post and consider the evidence you provided; it is clearly not evidence.